Bitcoin from 2009 to 2025: From currency of the future to digital gold

Bitcoin from 2009 to 2025: From currency of the future to digital gold

By admin, Ocak 20, 2025








See Full Size


Its mysterious creator, who uses the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto When he introduced Bitcoin to the world in 2009it was not yet possible to talk about a cryptocurrency world. The world of crypto money, which has now turned into a huge industry, would be established through the excitement created by Bitcoin and, in part, by spending it. Since the world that dominates the discussion around Bitcoin today did not yet exist, this new technology was talked about in a much different context. Bitcoin, which is now seen almost entirely as an investment tool, was much more than that when it was first released. We do not know its purpose as well as its identity. Satoshi NakamotoAccording to some, he presented a valuable gift to the world with an activist spirit, and according to others, with completely evil intentions. Because, unlike the digital currencies that came before it, Bitcoin It was the first currency that could be completely free from central control. In this respect, it promises a new world of finance, away from the control of governments, and will one day be able to destroy the hegemony of the dollar. It was seen as the “currency of the future”.

In the Early 2010s, Discussions About Bitcoin Were Progressing on a Very Different Axis

American entrepreneur, founder of Netscape Marc AndreessenWriting in 2013, he wrote: “A mysterious new technology has appeared out of nowhere, but is actually the result of twenty years of intense work by researchers you’ve never heard of. Political idealists ascribe to this technology dreams of liberation and revolution, while the establishment elite despise it.” On the other hand, technology enthusiasts look at it with fascination because they see tremendous potential in it (…) A libertarian fairy tale. far from being a simple Silicon Valley scam. Bitcoin is a tremendous opportunity to reimagine how the financial system can and should work in the internet age.…”

Again the same year Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugmanwrote an article for The New York Times explaining why Bitcoin is not a good alternative as a currency. Regardless of which side of this debate you are on, it was the focus of conversations around Bitcoin in 2013. Because this exciting invention of Satoshi Nakamoto was a candidate to be the currency of the future. So what happened over the past 12 years that Bitcoin has almost completely moved away from its potential and turned into a kind of digital gold used for investment purposes?

“Money must be both a medium of exchange and a reasonably stable store of value.”




Bitcoin from 2009 to 2025: From currency of the future to digital gold




See Full Size


There is more than one answer to this question, depending on who you ask. The first of these answers is hidden in Paul Krugman’s article dated 2013. In his article questioning the validity of Bitcoin as a currency, Krugman says: “So far, almost all Bitcoin discussions have been about positive economics: Could this really work? I have to say that I am still not convinced about this. In order for it to be successful, money must be both a medium of exchange and It needs to be a reasonably stable store of value. It is entirely unclear why Bitcoin should be considered a stable store of value..”

Saifedean Ammous, author of The Bitcoin Standard Although economists like Paul Krugman disputed this issue, Krugman was not the only economist to argue that Bitcoin was unconvincing as a store of value. Therefore, it can be said that in the past 12 years, those on this side of the debate have prevailed, and Bitcoin has never been able to realize its potential as a currency because it could not convince people.

Claim: Bitcoin Was Blocked Because It Threatens the Hegemony of the Petro-Dollar

A second possibility is that Bitcoin’s promise of a decentralized monetary system was deemed objectionable by major states and was deliberately and systematically suppressed. It has been talked about for years that the USA, which especially wants to protect the hegemony of the petro-dollar in the world, sees Bitcoin as a great threat and is doing its best to prevent it. In fact, several remarkable books have been written on this subject. one of them Roger Ver‘s new book published last year Hijacking Bitcoin‘Of.

Roger Ver, one of the first names to invest in this cryptocurrency and known as the CEO of bitcoin.com, The CIA contacted leading Bitcoin investors before many people had even heard of Bitcoin. He states that he is trying to learn how this new technology works. According to Ver, intelligence agencies, which had this new technology on their radar from the moment it was released, started the intervention process in 2011, when Bitcoin began to receive wide coverage in the world press. Ver says that things started to change rapidly in the forums that were at the center of Bitcoin-related posts in those years. Stating that the information flow has become unreliable due to bot accounts that suddenly appeared, Ver draws attention to the rapid change of administrators in these forums in the same period and claims that after the administrators changed, all opinions advocating that Bitcoin could be used as a currency were censored. According to Ver, intelligence agencies, which took control of the information flow about Bitcoin at that time, have been directing the course of this technology since then.

The Network Effect Blocking Bitcoin Cash and Its Similars




Bitcoin Cash




See Full Size


Investors like Roger Ver, who wanted to prevent Bitcoin from moving away from its mission of being a widely used digital currency and turning into a completely digital investment tool, created Bitcoin Cash as a reaction to the BIP update in 2017. Later, another fork occurred in this altcoin and Bitcoin Cash ve Bitcoin Satoshi Vision Two different bitcoin alternatives have emerged: However, today the value of both is far behind Bitcoin. Financial analyst Lyn Aldenattributes this to Bitcoin’s network effect. Alden explains this issue with an example.

“Technically, I could copy Wikipedia and open a site called Lynpedia and put all that data there (all the data from Wikipedia fits on a USB stick). But even if I did that, would I be a serious competitor to Wikipedia? Of course not. Even if I copied all the text, I wouldn’t be able to replicate the hundreds of millions of links pointing to Wikipedia on countless websites, the top search rankings that Wikipedia has, the massive server capacity, or the community of people who constantly update Wikipedia. “Anyone can copy Bitcoin’s blockchain and create their own fork. The question is whether they can convince miners, node operators, and the majority of users to see this fork as the ‘real’ bitcoin.”

Because Bitcoin now has a network effect that is beyond their reach, even altcoins that use the same technology, such as Bitcoin Cash and Bitcoin Satoshi Vision, cannot create the value to threaten it. So not only has Bitcoin moved away from its mission to be the currency of the future, it has also has become an obstacle to similar initiatives created for this purpose.. This being the case, it does not seem likely that Bitcoin will go beyond its current role as a digital investment tool.






Source

https://archive.nytimes.com/dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/01/21/why-bitcoin-matters/?_php=true&_type=blogs&smid=tw-share&_r=0


https://www.forbes.com/sites/digital-assets/2023/08/29/bitcoins-evolution-into-a-legitimate-form-of-money/


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dbLHXOipQN4


https://www.lynalden.com/bitcoins-network-effect/



















Araç çubuğuna atla